Blog - NEW

INFO FOR OLT

November 5, 2026November 5, 2026Northwomen

*This information is subject to change** You can read my letter that I sent here My Letter to OLT

UPDATE NOVEMBER 5th.

I reached out the coordinator. Sending an email with your concerns is not guaranteed that everyone on the case will read it. You can ask to speak, but that is a different process Here is what she shared with me.

Good morning,

Thank you for your email.

Q1. – You should file your submission at least 10 days prior to the event. If that falls on a Sunday, you can have the submission file on the next Monday.

Q2. – If you are just attending to observe the event, you are not required to submit any forms. All Tribunal’s events are open to the public unless otherwise stated. You will remain as an observer during the proceeding.

Q3. – If you are seeking for participant status, you are required to submit the proper form with your statement and return it back to the Tribunal, and the parties’ counsel. The parties’ counsel name can be found in “Schedule A” on the Tribunal’s Notice (attached).

Q4. – Please kindly put “OLT-26-000853” on the subject line for all future correspondence with the Tribunal.

Q5. – You can submit letter of concerns to the Tribunal and the letter will keep in the case as file record and be reviewed by the presiding Adjudicator.

Here is the Scehdule A document to download, OLT-26-000853 – Notice of CMC (Nov 18 2026) nt

I sent the following message to ask to speak because I believe that we should be heard.

To Whom It May Concern,

I believe it is important that the people most affected by the proposed development at 202 Second Street have an opportunity to be heard during this hearing, being the residents of Cobourg who will have to live in the shadow (literally and metaphorically) of this development if it approved.

I am therefore request that I, Maria Papaioannoy, a resident of Cobourg, be given the opportunity to speak at the hearing, present my position and respond to any questions. I also ask that it more residents are given the same opportunity.

I have also attached a written submission that I respectfully request be included in the hearing record and considered as part of the proceedings. I don’t think it is right that residents voices be excluded and not have input on this decision.

As per instructions, I am disclosing that I used AI to check grammar and spelling of my submission and allowed those changes to happen.

Thank you for considering my request.

Sincerely,

Maria Papaioannoy
Cobourg Resident

Good morning,

The proposed eight-storey development beside Victoria Hall goes before the Ontario Land Tribunal on November 18, 2026. Here’s how you can have your say.

There’s been a lot of discussion about the proposed development at 202 Second Street and what it could mean for Cobourg’s historic downtown.

The developers are Balder Corporation and Dez Capital, operating through 202 Second Street Inc. You can see their plans here.

I’ve spent years writing letters to governments, politicians and public officials about issues I care about. I do it all the time, and I’ve learned that you don’t need to be an expert to speak up. You just need to know how.

So, if you’re concerned about this development, here’s what you need to do.

IMPORTANT DATES

November 8: Calculated 10-day deadline for participant requests. This falls on a Sunday, so confirm the actual deadline with the OLT immediately.
November 14: Scheduled closure of the public parking lot at 202 Second Street.
November 18: Scheduled Ontario Land Tribunal hearing.

STEP 1: WRITE YOUR LETTER

Keep it simple. Explain who you are, why you care about Cobourg and what concerns you about the proposal.

Some things you might want to address:

Victoria Hall: How could an eight-storey building affect its historic setting?
Height and character: Does the proposed building fit our downtown?
Sunlight and shadows: What impact could it have on surrounding properties?
Traffic and parking: How might the development affect downtown accessibility?
Responsible development: What would a better approach look like?

My advice: Pick two or three concerns, explain them in your own words and be specific. Planning and heritage impacts are particularly important to the Tribunal.

STEP 2: CONTACT THE ONTARIO LAND TRIBUNAL (i will update you on this)

This is important: Simply emailing a letter does not automatically make you a formal participant in the hearing.

You may need to complete a Participant Status Request Form and Participant Statement Form to have your written concerns formally considered.

Find the OLT participant form here.

The standard deadline is generally 10 days before the first hearing event, but you should contact the case coordinator immediately to confirm the requirements and deadline for this particular case.

Send your email to:

cissy.ip@ontario.ca

Suggested subject line:

202 Second Street, Cobourg – Request for Participant Status

Ask how to submit your written concerns formally, whether you need participant status and who must receive copies of your documents.

You can also copy the following contacts to share your concerns with the lawyers, Town staff and Council. Confirm the official service list with the Tribunal before filing.

CC (copy and paste):

apilkington@cassels.com; jevola@cassels.com; dneligan@airdberlis.com; mayor@cobourg.ca; abureau@cobourg.ca; mmutton@cobourg.ca; bdarling@cobourg.ca; randyo.curtis@gmail.com; markhmills5@gmail.com; joeljmscott@gmail.com; blarmer@cobourg.ca

STEP 3: A FEW TIPS FROM SOMEONE WHO DOES THIS ALL THE TIME

I’ve written more letters to government officials than I care to count. Here’s what I’ve learned:

Get to the point. Say why you’re writing.
Make it personal. Explain why it matters to you.
Stick to facts and give examples.
Be respectful, but don’t be afraid to be direct.
Say what you want the decision-makers to consider.
Keep a copy of everything you submit.

Using ChatGPT to help? The OLT requires disclosure when generative AI creates content in documents filed for its proceedings. Check the Tribunal’s AI rules before submitting.

WANT TO KNOW MORE?

I’ve gathered a few links so you can read about the development yourself.

The developers and proposal

Planning and local news

I’ve heard it all before. “There’s nothing we can do.” “The developers will win.” “Why bother?” I’ve spent years speaking up, and I can tell you that you don’t win every battle. But you certainly won’t win any by deciding you’ve already lost.

You don’t have to agree with me about this development. But if you care about what happens to Cobourg’s downtown, make your views known. Your voice matters.

My Letter to OLT

November 5, 2026November 5, 2026Northwomen

This is the letter I plan on sending. I will be sending it after I have confirmed all the correct details and will share the information VIA my page.

Dear Members of the Ontario Land Tribunal,

My name is Maria Papaioannoy, and I have lived in Cobourg since 2016. I chose to make Cobourg my home for many reasons, but one of the biggest was its respect for its history and the people who built this community.

One of the coolest things about Cobourg is that the names you see on our streets, in our parks and even engraved on the walls of our churches belong to families who still live here today and these our my neighbours. You don’t see that kind of connection to history so easily in other parts of Ontario.

I’m sharing this because I am disgusted by the proposed eight-storey development at 202 Second Street. But what troubles me even more is the feeling that the people who live here are not being heard. You folks will ultimately decide whether this development moves forward, and before making that decision, I want you to understand what Cobourg’s heritage means to someone like me, who call’s it home.

I hope that by the end of this letter, you feel uncomfortable with the thought of making a decision that could permanently change a town you do not call home. For you, this may be another file to close. For us, it’s our home, and we will be living with the consequences long after you’ve moved on to the next case.

In the early 1970s, Victoria Hall was almost demolished. The building had fallen into disrepair, the cost of fixing it was enormous, and there were people on Cobourg Council who thought tearing it down and replacing it with a parking lot was the answer.

But one woman disagreed. Her name was Lenah Field Fisher, a Cobourg councillor who was the only one to vote against demolishing Victoria Hall. She helped rally the community, and in 1972, a group was formed to save Victoria Hall. It took more than a decade and millions of dollars, but they saved it.

Lenah knew history and character of our downtown are worth saving, even if that value doesn’t show up on a developer’s balance sheet. Sadly, Lenah died in 1980, three years before Victoria Hall reopened. She never got to see the results of what she fought for, but the rest of us get to enjoy it every day.

And here we are, more than 50 years later, fighting to protect the area around the very building she helped save. I wonder what Lenah would think about an eight-storey development going up so close to Victoria Hall. I can’t speak for her, but I am sure she would have a few things to say.

Originally, the developer wanted nine storeys, with 196 residential units, commercial space and parking. After considerable opposition, the proposal was reduced to eight storeys. One floor. I am not sure how removing one floor is supposed to address the concerns residents have raised about the size of this building.

We are talking about putting an eight-storey building next to one of Cobourg’s most important historic landmarks, Victoria Hall, in a downtown where most buildings are a fraction of that height. How does that make sense? Its clock tower and architecture are part of what makes Cobourg recognizable. Now imagine an eight-storey building competing with it for attention. Not only would it change the view of Victoria Hall, but it would also change the feel of the streets around it and the views from our waterfront.

And then what? If eight storeys are acceptable here, what’s stopping the next developer from asking for the same thing down the street? At what point do we stop calling Cobourg’s downtown historic if we keep allowing buildings that don’t fit? Once they’re built, there’s no turning back.

I’m not against development. We need housing, we need businesses and we need to grow. But surely we can do that without sacrificing what makes Cobourg special. Supporting housing shouldn’t mean having to accept every building a developer wants to put up, regardless of its size or location. And there are still real questions about parking, traffic and how this development would affect the people and businesses already downtown.

But here’s what really bothers me. Residents have attended meetings, written letters, asked questions and spoken up. We’ve followed the process, given our time and tried to make our concerns heard. Nobody is paying us to do this. We’re not going to make a profit if this development is rejected. We’re doing it because we care about where we live.

I understand that you have planning laws and regulations to follow, but the people who live in a community should hold the same value in decisions about its future. Imagine this happening in your own neighbourhood, someone proposing a building that you believe would permanently change the place you love. You attend meetings, you write letters, you raise concerns, and in the end, you feel like none of it matters. How would you feel?

And if you want another example of why residents feel powerless, look at what’s happened with the parking lot at 202 Second Street. For years, the Town leased that property to provide downtown parking. In September, we learned that the property owner, Balder Corporation, wanted more money. The Town made a counteroffer, which was rejected, and now the parking lot is scheduled to close on November 14.

I understand it’s private property, and the owner has every right to negotiate a lease. But given everything happening with this development, I find the decision petty and immature. The developer controls the property and can afford to take the Town to a provincial tribunal and remove access to parking which will hurt the businesses around them. Are these the actions of people who want to be part of a community?

To me, this is another example of people with money wielding their power over the people who actually live here. And frankly, I’m tired of it.

I am asking the Tribunal to seriously consider whether an eight-storey building belongs in this part of Cobourg. Not just whether it can be built, but whether it should be built. I hope you will listen to the people who know this town, love this town and will live with the consequences of your decision.

I’m asking you to come to Cobourg, look at what is being proposed and listen to the people who live here. Lenah Field Fisher fought to save Victoria Hall. We’re asking you to help protect the historic downtown around it. I would welcome the opportunity to attend the hearing and tell you that in person. Cobourg is our home. It is not simply someone else’s investment.

Sincerely,

Maria Papaioannoy
Cobourg, Ontario

Information that I know so far: https://northumberlandwomen.com/2026/11/05/info-for-olt/

Doxxing or Accountability

April 7, 2026Northwomen

In a time when nearly everything can be found online, a new question is starting to surface in our communities: when does sharing information cross the line into doxxing? A recent local dispute on a Port Hope facebook group has brought that question into focus. So I decided to look into it and learn all I can about this situation.

The Back Story

A Facebook post raised concerns about municipal decision-making, questioning whether infrastructure priorities may have benefited a mayor’s family members, and referenced a specific street, tying those decisions to a geographic area associated with the mayor and her family. In response, the mayor issued a formal communication through the municipality demanding the post be removed, citing misinformation, bullying, and doxxing, specifically the identification of a personal residential location.

There is this idea that: “If it’s already online, it’s fair game.” But it’s not that simple. Digging into this I found out that Canadian law doesn’t just ask, “Is the information public?” It looks at how the information was used, why it was shared, and what impact it could have. In other words, context matters just as much as availability.

Even publicly available information can be an issue, depending on how it’s handled. For example, under Elections Canada rules, financial contributions to campaigns, which include contributor names and addresses, are publicly disclosed, whether a candidate wins or not. But realistically, how many people know where to find that information, or go looking for it? That’s an important aspect to this issue, which has blown up over that same facebook page.

That’s where the real question begins. Did the original poster take that information and collect and reframe it? Did they amplify it to a wider audience? Did they connect it to a person’s physical location in a charged context? Because then we have to look at intent. Information can be public, and still be thought of as private depending on how it is framed and the intent behind it.

One of my biggest pet peeves is when people casually throw around the term “freedom of speech” in Canada. To be clear, what we have is freedom of expression, and it is protected under Section 2(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. This protection is especially strong when it comes to political speech, criticism of government, and questions about public decision-making. In fact, speech about elected officials and public policy is among the most protected forms of expression in Canada. That means asking questions like “Who benefits from this decision?” or “Why was one project prioritized over another?” is not just allowed, it’s essential to a functioning democracy.

But rights have limits. Freedom of expression in Canada is not absolute. Under Section 1 of the Charter, limits can be placed on expression if they are reasonable and justified in a free and democratic society. This is where things get more complex. Expression can lose protection when it crosses into defamation, false statements that damage someone’s reputation harassment or threats, violations of privacy, or situations where it is likely to cause real world harm.

So we have two things happening in a single post. First, there’s the political criticism, questioning infrastructure decisions and raising concerns about who benefits. That kind of speech is not only allowed, but also a core part of how a healthy democracy works. Public officials are expected to face scrutiny, even when it’s uncomfortable or pointed. But then there’s the second part: referencing a specific residential location tied to the Mayors family members. That’s where things start to shift. Even if that information exists somewhere online, wrapping it up all together into a simple digestible package is where the lines start to blur. That’s likely why the municipality leaned on the term “doxxing.” Still, this isn’t a clear-cut case, it lives in a grey area between legitimate criticism and personal exposure.

Canada doesn’t have a specific law called “doxxing,”, but depending on the situation, things can still cross legal lines. If someone makes claims about favouritism or misconduct that aren’t true and damage a person’s reputation, that can lead to defamation issues. If personal information is shared in a way that feels intrusive or crosses a reasonable boundary, it could raise privacy concerns. And if sharing that information leads to fear, threats, or repeated targeting, it can even move into harassment territory. However, I don’t know if any of that happened, or the letter was pre-emptive.

Canadian courts historically have placed a high value on people speaking in good faith about issues that matter, especially when it comes to politics and holding public officials accountable.

So the question now is, did the mayor take this too far or is is just? That answer can only be answered by a court in would most likely be a long, expensive process because based on what I see we are looking at challenging the Charter. And that can be a long and very expensive process. There are organization that would take this one, but I digress, I don’t think this would go there, unless the mayor and the municipality want to start this process. is where I am going to share my opinion, because we all have one don’t we? On one hand, there’s a strong case for the mayor’s response. Public officials, and especially their families, deserve a level of privacy and safety, and highlighting where someone lives can create real-world risks. Especially in smaller communities where everyone knows everyonses buisiness.

On the other hand, public officials are expected to tolerate a high level of scrutiny, even when it’s uncomfortable. Labeling criticism as “doxxing” may overstate what actually happened, and responding with formal demands and legal language can discourage people from speaking up at all. Which can lead to unintended consequences.

At its core, this situation isn’t just about a Facebook post, it’s about the tension between three competing ideas: the right to question those in power, the right to personal privacy and safety, and the reality of what happens when institutions push back on individuals. And the truth is, none of these exist in isolation.

Freedom of expression protects our right to challenge power, but not necessarily our right to expose personal details in the process. And just because something is online doesn’t mean it should be highlighed. This situation doesn’t present a clear villain or victim. I am seeing support for both sides. What is is doing, is highlighting something more important: the line between accountability and exposure isn’t fixed, it’s something we negotiate in real time, in our communities, often in moments exactly like this.

With an election year ahead here in Ontario, we’re likely to see more situations like this unfold. That shouldn’t stop any of us from questioning or criticizing elected officials, that’s part of democracy. But it does mean we should be thoughtful about what we choose to collect and share. And for those choosing to run, it’s worth remembering: accountability doesn’t just happen online, it happens at the ballot box. And voters remember.

Chili for the Community: Starting the Year with Eyes Wide Open

October 22, 2025Northwomen

There’s a saying that my mom always shared that’s guided this little local tradition from the very beginning:

“The way you start the year is the way the year will be.”

On January 1st, 2021, I decided to take that saying to heart, but in a different way than before.

You see, I’ve always been one for traditions. I’ve done it all! I’ve put money under my carpet for prosperity, burned an effigy to release the past (and honestly, I might do that one again this year), eaten twelve grapes at the stroke of midnight for good luck, and banged pots and pans loud enough to scare away every bad spirit in the county. If there was a ritual for a good year, I probably tried it.=

But after all those years of chasing luck, I realized something: none of it felt quite right.
Because deep down, I knew that doing all these things, these yiayia-isms (Greek for old wives’ tales) ,didn’t mean much if I wasn’t helping others.

All the noise, the grapes, the coins… it was fun, but it wasn’t fulfilling. What really mattered was starting the year with kindness with ensuring people were seen, with community.

The Beginning of Something Warm

So on New Year’s Day 2021, I cooked a big pot of chili and invited others to join me. There was no grand plan, no committee, n

o fancy event name, just a few people coming together to share food and warmth.

And from that first pot of chili, Chili for the Community was born.

What began as a simple gesture a way to make sure no one was alone on the first day of the year, has turned into a beautiful local tradition. Because let’s be honest, New Year’s Day can be one of the hardest days of the year. The holidays are over, the house feels quiet, and that “fresh start” can sometimes feel more lonely than exciting.

That’s why this matters. No one should start the year alone.

Five Years of Connection

Now, five years later, Chili for the Community has become a tradition built on warmth, generosity, and the power of togetherness. Volunteers chop and stir with love, neighbours drop by with bread or water, local businesses donate ingredients, and people from every walk of life gather to share a meal.

It’s never just about the chili it’s about connection. It’s about seeing one another. It’s about starting the year not with resolutions, but with compassion. Not with isolation, but with inclusion.

When we sit down together, strangers, friends, neighbours, we remind ourselves what really counts: kindness, community, and the warmth of knowing you belong.

Join Us — January 1st, 2026 | 1:00–4:00 PM

This New Year’s Day, January 1st, 2026, marks the 5th anniversary of Chili for the Community, five years of food, laughter, and love shared across the table.

From 1:00 to 4:00 p.m., everyone is welcome at the Green Wood Coalition space at 20 King Street West in Cobourg.

Bring a pot of chili, donate a case of water, a bag of beans, or simply come and share a meal with others.

Because if the way we start the year is the way the year will be.
Let’s start it together, with kindness, warmth, and maybe a few good yiayia-isms thrown in for luck.

Want to help out, send me an an email at hello@northumberlandwomen.com so we can connect!

Outdated and Out of Touch: Cobourg’s RV Parking Rules Need to Change

July 19, 2025Northwomen

A few weeks ago I was accused of starting THIS PETITION. So not true, and you can read about the witch hunt HERE.

I am starting a petition today: You can find it HERE, and its about letting the residents of Cobourg park their RV’s in their driveways. Believe it or not, our zoning bylaws ban anyone from parking an RV 2o feet or longer on their own property, and its is an trying process to try and get an exemption.

I own an RV, and I have spent the last 3 years trying to figure out how to change this bylaw, and finally, the zoning bylaws are changing and its time to speak up!

The Town of Cobourg isn’t changing its Zoning Bylaw for RV parking on residential property. It’s choosing to keep it exactly the same during its current zoning by-law review. From what I can find, this by-law dates back to around 1999 or 2000: when cell phones had antennas, SUVs were boxy, and the idea of remote work or van life wasn’t part of everyday conversation. A lot has changed since then. Recreational vehicles have become bigger, more common, and more essential to how Canadians travel, camp, and live. So why hasn’t Cobourg’s by-law kept up?

The Current Rule (Still) Doesn’t Make Sense

Under the existing by-law, residents in most residential zones are prohibited from parking RVs over 6 metres (19.7 feet) in length on their private property.

Here’s the problem:

Most RVs today are longer than 6 metres
- Travel trailers: 7 to 12 m (23–40 ft)
- Motorhomes: 8 to 13.7 m (26–45 ft)
That means most RV owners are already in violation, or must pay for off-site storage, even if they have room in their driveways.

An Expensive Problem for Everyday Residents

Commercial storage isn’t cheap, residents report paying anywhere from $1,200 to $2,000+ per year, depending on location and availability. And in Cobourg, you can’t just apply for an easy exemption to park at home. The alternative is to go through the minor variance process, which involves:

Formal applications
Professional site plans or surveys
Public notification
A fee that can reach over $5,000 all-in

That’s a steep price just to legally park a licensed vehicle in your own driveway.

Enforcement Is Complaint-Driven and Inconsistent

This is what bothers me the most. The enforcement is “complaint driven. The Town only enforces zoning violations like RV parking when someone complains. That means enforcement is inconsistent and selective, one neighbour could face fines while another doesn’t, based solely on who lives next door to who. That’s not good policy that’s playing bylaw bingo.

RV Ownership Is Common and Growing

Over 2 million Canadians own RVs, and according to the RVDA of Canada, the median age of an RV owner is 55. For many retirees, RVs are not a luxury, they’re the key to affordable, flexible travel. That’s especially true in a post COVID world, where outdoor recreation has soared in popularity.

RVs are also already part of Cobourg’s landscape. Take a drive around and you’ll spot many parked safely in driveways across the town. I have been counting them on my daily walks. In just a 2.5 KM radius from where I live I have counted over 81 in the last few month. I am happy that no one has complained about them, and I have no intention of complaining. To me, it’s about changing bylaws that just don’t make sense. And the tried true argument of OTHERS do it, is weak at best. We are not like other towns. So why should we start with this?

Time to Catch Up With Reality

Port Hope allows RVs on residential properties. Many other towns across Ontario do too. Cobourg, on the other hand, is still clinging to a zoning bylaw written for a different era. This isn’t about allowing people to live in RVs on their front lawns, it’s about respecting residents’ right to responsibly store their property on their own land.

Lets Talk Petition

So back to where I started. I started a PETITION Calling on Cobourg Town Council and the planning department to remove the 6-metre restriction for RV’s from the current zoning by-law and develop more modern, balanced rules that reflect how people live today.

Since you have come this far I will assume you believe in common sense bylaws that serve residents rather than punish them, please sign and share. Let’s make sure our local policies reflect today’s realities not those of 25 years ago.

You can download the proposed zoning bylaws and give them a read! Just head over the town of Cobourg website and scroll to the bottom. You don’t want bylaw knocking on your door because you made a mistake!

xoxo

Maria

I Can’t Believe I Have to Say This: Vigilantism Is Not the Way

July 5, 2025Northwomen

I was recently in Warsaw, where I presented a keynote entitled “What I Hear vs. What I Know: Battling Misinformation from the Newsroom to the Facebook Comment Section.”

So, it would be hypocritical of me to sit this one out. I believe in truth, I believe in facts. And I believe in speaking out when misinformation begins to take hold, when it’s uncomfortable, even when it’s local and especially when it’s directed at me.

I can’t believe I have to post this, but here we are.

Vigilantism, especially when it drags in people who aren’t even involved, is not just wrong, it’s deeply damaging. It’s reckless, misinformed, and ultimately counterproductive. Attacking your neighbours based on hearsay and rumours that you believe happened gets ugly fast. Before you go down that cancel culture route, reach out and ask for the truth first.

And truly, why do you want to cancel people?

I’ve been caught in the crosshairs of this kind of behaviour recently, and I need to set the record straight.

This week, I received a message from a friend asking if I was the person who wrote the current petition requesting that Cobourg Mayor Lucas Cleveland step down. My response?

My father died.

I don’t have time to bother with the mayor.

Please screenshot and add that to the post.

What I didn’t realize was that a few folks in that conversation thought to take action against me, in what we now call cancel culture. All because they THOUGHT I wrote a petition.

One of them went as far as to send an email to the community radio station (that I volunteer at, mind you) and accused me of making false statements about the mayor on-air to “influence my listeners.” They questioned my ethics, my integrity, and my role as a volunteer.

What makes it even more absurd? They didn’t even bother to get my name right. They half-guessed it, used my married name (which I rarely use on-air), and made it crystal clear that they’ve never actually listened to the shows I host. Which is too bad, because they’re missing out on getting to know some very special and incredible community members.

Shameless Plug Time: Listen to Northumberland Women Mondays between 8-9pm on Northumberland89.7

Over the past year, I’ve hosted two shows:

Northumberland Women
Northumberland @ 5 (Wednesdays)

Mayor Cleveland has been a guest on Northumberland @ 5 multiple times. Our conversations have been thoughtful, challenging, and, above all, honest. I know they strike a chord because I’ve had people tell me I was “too hard” and/or “too soft” on him, simultaneously (that’s when you know you’re doing something right).

The mayor and I don’t always agree. In fact, he’s told me that some of my positions are too conservative for his taste. But we show up, we talk, we engage, because that’s what community media is for: broadcasting diverse voices from various perspectives.

Let me be clear: we live in a news desert. We have precious few outlets that offer a variety of viewpoints, and that’s dangerous. That is how misinformation thrives and echo chambers grow.

Northumberland 89.7 is a community radio station. We provide a platform for voices from across the county. Most of us are volunteers. We aren’t driven by profit or political gain; we’re here because we care. Silencing someone because you assume they don’t agree with you is absolutely ridiculous.

If you disagree with a viewpoint? Challenge it. That’s how we learn and grow as a community.

Northumberland 89.7 is always open to hearing thoughts and ideas from the community we serve, and are always looking for volunteers. If you have a show idea! Send them a pitch at info@northumberland897.ca

Don’t like a petition? Great. Start one that reflects your views. Why waste energy to cancel someone out? We live in a democratic society that provides us with the tools to express our disagreements openly and constructively.

Cancel culture isn’t a left- or right-wing phenomenon. It’s a ridiculous notion. So much time is wasted trying to shut down others, while that time can be spent using our own voice to amplify what we are saying. I mean, trying to get someone fired? Shut down their events? Calling their advocacy work a cult? Bonus points on the drama and decisive language but most of us that do work in activism and advocacy, have heard worse than being called a cult.

The secret is, not to listen to to loudest ones, because they are simply distractions. Continue to do the work that you believe in.

We will never all agree. That’s life. That’s politics. That’s human.

Let’s do better. Let’s talk to each other, not about each other.

Let’s build community, not tear it down.

And most importantly, spend time amplifying your message instead of shutting down someone else’s.

XOXO – Maria

Provincial Election 2025: Everything You Need to Know

February 11, 2025Northwomen

I’ve spent the last few days searching for answers to a simple question: “Who is running in my riding of Northumberland?” Finding clear information has been a challenge, so I’ve compiled everything you need to know to make an informed decision in the Ontario provincial election on February 27, 2025.

What is my Riding?

Northumberland-Peterborough South is a large riding spanning approximately 3,001 square KM. It includes: Municipality of Brighton, Municipality of Port Hope, Municipality of Trent Hills, Town of Cobourg, Township of Alnwick-Haldimand, Township of Asphodel-Norwood, Township of Cramahe, Township of Hamilton, Township of Otonabee-South Monaghan, City of Quinte West, Municipality of Clarington.

If you want to confirm the riding you live in head over to elections Ontario to double check, all you need is your postal code.

If you live in this area, this guide is for you! Bookmark this page as I’ll be updating it with more election details as they come in. Stay informed and make your vote count!

Why Your Vote Matters

Many people say, “I don’t want to get political.” But here’s the thing—your vote matters. By voting, you have a say in who represents you locally and provincially. This representation affects everything from healthcare and education to transportation and environmental policies. Essentially, voting is an opportunity to actively participate in shaping the future of your communities and province.

How Ontario’s Election Works

We don’t vote directly for the premier. Instead, we elect a Member of Provincial Parliament (MPP), who then votes for their party’s leader. So, if you support a particular party leader, you should vote for the local candidate from that party.

Key Election Details

Election Date: February 27, 2025
Why the Early Election? Ontario Premier Doug Ford has called a provincial election in response to U.S. President Donald Trump’s proposed 25% tariff on Canadian imports, arguing that Ontario needs a renewed mandate to protect its economy.

How Do I Learn More about my Candidate

I think it’s important that you do your research. Over the next few weeks, you’ll see a lot of posts shared on your social media. That’s because every election matters—and the most important thing you can do is vote informed.

In our riding, there will be several events, including town halls, debates, and interviews. I’ll compile all the details in a separate blog post and link it here once it’s ready.

Make sure to tune in to Northumberland 89.7—yes, the radio station where I host two shows! The station is dedicated to keeping our community informed. I’ll share the full broadcast schedule soon, but in the meantime, you can listen by:
📻 Turning your dial to 89.7 FM
💻 Streaming online at northumberland897.ca
🔊 Simply asking, “Alexa, play Northumberland 89.7,”—and, like magic, she does!

Stay informed, stay engaged, and most importantly—vote!

Who Are our Local Candidates (in alphabetical order)

All Bios are taken and shortened from candidates websites

Joshua Chalhoub New Blue Party

Maxwell Groves The Green Party

Born and raised in Port Hope, Northumberland County, Maxwell Groves has returned home after years in Toronto, eager to give back to his community.

He was inspired to run for the Green Party because he believes rural communities are often overlooked by mainstream politics and need a strong voice in government.

As an avid outdoorsman and conservationist, Maxwell is passionate about protecting watersheds, preserving farmland, and promoting sustainable agriculture. He is also committed to improving rural transit to help residents access essential services and finding innovative, sustainable solutions to homelessness.

Bruce Lepage New Democratic Party (NDP)

Bruce Lepage is committed to ensuring that government works for everyone—not just the well-heeled and well-connected. His priority has always been people and helping everyone achieve a good quality of life.

With his wife having grown up in Cobourg, Bruce knew that Northumberland County was the perfect place to raise their son. They moved to Port Hope in 1999 and settled in Cobourg in 2003. Bruce spent over 30 years teaching physics, general science, philosophy, and history—first in Toronto, then in local schools. From 2007 until his retirement in 2022, he served as the IB Coordinator at Cobourg DCI East/Cobourg Collegiate. Beyond the classroom, Bruce coached basketball and soccer, volunteers with his therapy dog, Camus, and is a dedicated community activist, advocating for affordable housing, human rights, electoral reform, healthcare, and workers’ rights.

Bruce believes that by working together, we can improve life for everyone in Northumberland-Peterborough South. Together, we can tackle the housing crisis, address the shortage of medical professionals, and make life more affordable for workers, families, seniors, and those in need. Let’s build a stronger community—together!

Dorothy Noronha Ontario Liberal Party

For over 20 years, Northumberland has been home to Dorothy Noronha, who, along with her family, cherishes their residence nestled in the Northumberland forest.

Currently, Dorothy teaches business and leadership at Cobourg Collegiate Institute (CCI) and is a member of the CCI Senior Boys Basketball coaching team. One of her greatest joys is welcoming CCI graduates back to share their business successes with current students.

Before transitioning to teaching, Dorothy built a wealth of business experience as an employee benefits and pension specialist, a wealth and estate planning counselor, and a marketing professional in the healthcare sector. With over three decades of experience running small businesses, she brings real-world expertise into the classroom.

She aims to tackle ER wait times, family doctor shortages, and what she describes as the erosion of public services under Doug Ford’s government.

David Piccini Progressive Conservative Party of Ontario

David Piccini is the MPP for Northumberland-Peterborough South and Ontario’s Minister of Labour, Immigration, Training, and Skills Development. Previously, he served as Minister of Environment, Conservation, and Parks. Before joining the cabinet, David was the Parliamentary Assistant to the Minister of Training, Colleges, and Universities and a member of the Standing Committee on Finance and Economic Affairs.

His career began in the federal public service, where he worked in the Office of the Minister of International Trade, contributing to key initiatives such as the Canada-Europe Free Trade Agreement. He later joined the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, playing a key role in establishing the Canadian International Health Education Association.

A lifelong resident of Port Hope, David lives there with his wife and two dogs. He remains actively involved in his community as a member of the Royal Canadian Legion and a supporter of local youth soccer programs.

How To Vote

We have pulled some relevant information here, however, if you have more questions head over to elections Ontario for more information on how to vote

Voting Early

Early voting has begun and will continue until Wednesday, February 26th. If you’re unsure about your plans for Thursday, February 27th, or if you’re concerned about the weather (especially snow), it’s a great idea to vote early!

You can cast your vote at the Northumberland—Peterborough South Local Election Office:

Location:
330 Ward St, Unit 1
Port Hope, ON
Phone: 1-(833) 405-2633

Voting hours:

Monday to Saturday: 10:00 AM – 8:00 PM
Sunday: 12:00 PM – 5:00 PM

Voting by Mail

You can apply online to vote by mail and track the status of your application. Deadline to apply is 6pm EST on February 21st.

Once your application is reviewed and approved:

You will no longer be able to choose another voting option.
A voting kit, including a ballot, will be mailed to the address you provide. Please allow up to four days for processing.
You can return your completed voting kit using the prepaid envelope or drop it off at your local election office.

To be counted, Elections Ontario must receive your completed voting kit by 6:00 PM (Eastern Time) on election day.

In Person on Election Day

Voting day is Thursday, February 27, 2025. Voting location details will be available after February 14, 2025. Check back then or visit the Elections Ontario website to find your designated voting location.

Do I need to Register to Vote?

In Canada, you don’t need to pre-register to vote, but it can make election day much easier.

By registering in advance, you can:

Confirm that your information is accurate and linked to the correct address.
Receive a voter information card by mail, which makes the voting process smoother.
Ensure you are listed in the riding where you live.

You can register using this link—it takes less than five minutes, I promise!

I don’t have a permanent address or ID how can I vote?

I can’t share this enough. Voting is not a privilege to those that have a roof over their head. It is a right that is granted to every single Canadian Citizen. I know that there are so many in our community that are unhoused or have insecure housing. However, there is a way that you can vote and make a difference this election. If you know someone or support someone that is unhoused, please help them register if they want to vote.

If you do not have a permanent address, you can still vote at an advance voting location or on election day. The place where you most frequently eat or sleep in the past five weeks will be considered your address.

If you do not have ID showing both your name and home address, the administrator of your shelter, food bank, or community health care facility that you use most often will provide you with a Certificate of Identity and Residence form.

Both you and the administrator must sign the form, which you will then use as your ID when you go to vote. The administrator will help you find your assigned voting location using our Voter Information Service and will write this information on the form.

Take the signed form to your assigned voting location and present it to the election official. They will collect the form from you and issue you a ballot to cast your vote.

There is no excuse to cast your ballot on Thursday February 27th. Do your best to cast is as an informed voter! And don’t forget to listen to Northumberland 89.7 to get all your election news!

Good Bye Retail

October 17, 2023Northwomen

Saying Farewell to Retail and Embracing a New Journey

As I sit down to write this blog post, I can’t help but reflect on the journey I’ve been on since 2013, a journey that has defined a significant part of my identity.

For the past decade, owning retail shops, specifically vape shops, has been my life. It’s been a rollercoaster of experiences, challenges, and growth. However, as 2023 approaches, I find myself at a crossroads, ready to embark on a new chapter in my life.

Owning retail shops, especially in the vape industry, became more than just a business venture for me. It became a part of my identity. I poured my heart and soul into creating spaces where customers could find the products they sought and a sense of community. Over the years, I have met incredible people, built lasting relationships with customers and suppliers, and had the privilege of helping people make healthier choices for themselves.

This past year, I realized that retail was no longer where my heart lay. The industry was changing, and my passion for retail was fading. The daily grind, the ever-increasing regulations, and the constant challenges began to take their toll on me. I had more joy in fighting laws than following them.

I knew it was time for a change, a shift towards something that would reignite my sense of purpose and fulfillment.
I did carry a bit of regret that I paused to make this decision. I felt like I was holding on to something important. Even though the universe gave me so many signs, I kept ignoring them. It’s often the case that we cling to the familiar, even when it no longer serves our best interests. But sometimes, it takes a leap of faith to move forward, to leave the comfort zone behind.

Four hours after sending that email to the building management, letting them know that we are not renewing our lease, a phone call came, and I was asked to speak in Panama in November! The universe said, “Yes, Maria, you made the right decision.” It was a clear sign that I was on the right path and that letting go of my retail business was the right choice. The timing of this opportunity couldn’t have been more perfect, and it felt like a reward for having the courage to take a step into the unknown.

As I prepare to let go of my vape shops and retail business, I want to express my gratitude to everyone who has been a part of this incredible journey. I’m thankful for the experiences, the lessons, and the relationships that have shaped me into the person I am today.

The road ahead is uncertain, but I am determined to face it with courage and enthusiasm. It’s a journey of self-discovery, growth, and reinvention. And although it’s scary, the prospect of embracing a new adventure fills me with excitement and hope. Here’s to the unknown and to what the future holds. It’s a reminder that sometimes, you must let go of what no longer serves you to embrace something better.

Open Letter from V. Bailey to Cobourg

August 10, 2023August 10, 2023Northwomen

TRIGGER WARNING

Northumberland Women is a place where all women within our community are welcomed with open arms. We understand that some of the topics we discuss might stir discomfort in certain hearts. It’s natural for these conversations to evoke a range of emotions – discomfort, anger, sadness, and more. It’s possible that some will remain unaffected, while others might find solace in the fact that steps are being taken.

Regardless of where you stand in this spectrum of emotions, I kindly urge you to dedicate a moment to read a heartfelt letter composed during a time when one of our fellow community women is engaged in a relentless battle for her survival.

I implore you to delve into Virginia Lee Bailey’s open letter, a profound message that deserves to resonate with all of us. In times like these, everyone’s voice holds significance, and this holds especially true for Virginia’s.

I’m now one of the homeless.

As of Friday, July 28–that joyous day when I was removed from my home. Given an hour to pack up what I could of my life, not even able to access the boxes or totes or bags ordinarily used to pack up. Given a hotel room to stay in for 72 hours. Given a prepaid credit card amounting to just under $300.

Rushed and herded onto the waiting school bus. We were bussed away from any and all support networks. All on a weekend, leaving us with the 2-3 hours, on Monday morning, between the start of a work day for most agencies and hotel check out time. Left to scramble for shelter—all because the Town and Police needed to shut up the ignorant.

Alright. Enough already. Please just STOP. for a few minutes, stop and think.
Think of the people. The TAX PAYING, VOTING HUMANS that are part of YOUR COMMUNITY. The people displaced, exhausted, frightened, alone. Humans that are being denied their human rights. These are the people that “Community Policing at its Finest” has targeted.

Yes. It’s true. Some of us do live with addiction. It is, undeniably, a very real demon. One that many battle daily. However, some of us are simply poor or mentally ill or even just old.

We are, actually, very much like you. We are daughters and sons, nephews and nieces. Grandparents and grandchildren. We are business owners, contractors, hairstylists, PSWs, plumbers and electricians. Nurses and respite workers along with carpenters, custodians and ironworkers. We are paramedics and security guards. Surveyors, linesmen and heavy equipment operators. Cashiers, tellers, servers and bartenders. Chefs, estheticians, tattoo artists, musicians and photographers. General managers, firefighters and masons.

We grew up with you. Joined the same sports teams and attended the same schools. We played on the same swings and slid on the same slides.

There are varied reasons we now find ourselves in such vastly different places than you. Too many to list. Ranging from the COVID pandemic that cost so many Canadians their jobs to (yes,I know, you’re waiting for it ): addiction. With mental illness, abandonment, age, the housing crisis and inheritance in between.

I’m sure there are many of you shaking your head at my “excuses”. Those of you lacking compassion. The individuals who enjoy the benefits that come with community. The feelings of belonging and safety. The very same people that actively and purposely ensured so many others were denied the same. Enjoying the perks while bringing malice, fear and ignorance to a situation that should be handled instead with some social responsibility.

Consideration. Compassion, care, and effort, which also are supposed to be part of a community. That’s fine; you can shake your head and scoff at my words. I will still be one of many that will accept and care for you sister, son, friend, grandchild, if they ever find themselves lost or alone. If their community ever decides they just don’t wish to see them any longer. If they suddenly just aren’t worth anyone’s effort anymore.

Even if it’s you, reader. Even if you end up alone outside, desperate, or frightened. Still…. I’ll be there to help you find shelter or to share my food, to give you a hand when I’m able, and to lend my shoulder when you can’t stand being alone anymore.

I’ll help you–so will 21 others who come to mind, and so very many more individuals affected by this crisis. Regardless of the seemingly, hate-driven prejudice shown by ‘Your’ Community, we now can rely on ‘Ours’. We still stand. Together. Strong. Daily growing together.

Growing, unfortunately, in numbers as the housing crisis continues but more importantly, growing acceptance, ideas, strength, love, compassion. Those areas I just can’t see when I look at the vast majority of so-called ‘normal society’. Instead, I see the majority of self-proclaimed “good” or “decent” or “upstanding folk” escalate your own concerns.

Reflect on this…

No meetings are being held by the community demanding solutions for their neighbours that have fallen on the hardest of times. No, instead, this noble community of ours comes together with our local police, meeting to add to the suffering of these same people. I see you gossiping. Smiling. Patting each other on the back as you enjoy this victory. Happy that finally someone has helped get rid of the eyesore you just can’t stand to look at.

You can claim it’s not the aesthetics–it’s drugs. It’s crime. Come on. Use your heads.

We’re talking about real survival now. Did anyone in that meeting stand up and mention the risk of heat stroke, or just a few months from now, the hypothermia… can you even imagine that? Dying … freezing to death because your fellow Cobourgians didn’t want to look at you.

You think the best plan to lower crime rates is to take a bunch of already desperate people and put them in a life-or-death kind of desperate situation? Yeah… clever. You believed that the solution to the toxic drug crisis is you removing places that allowed people to remain together. To not use alone.

How is it that you combined so many minds, and dreamed up ways to keep drugs off the streets, by denying safe places? Thus, ensuring that there will, instead, be a whole lot more drugs on the streets. These were your solutions.

What exactly do you believe about the 6 people you have celebrated adding to the streets? I already don’t understand how the streets are thought to be safer than my home. The home that offers the things that the majority of your community members don’t bother with. The home that, on the coldest night of the year, when the warming room was short staffed and just closed for the night, welcomed 40 people into my space. 40! But I’m a bad person, right?

The same police officers hosting your meetings and enforcing evictions have many times relied on our assistance locating missing persons. They have dropped off individuals that were incapacitated–knowing they were safe with us. They have called us, refusing to release people to anyone else–knowing we would care for them.

My partner has resuscitated at least 28 people–the lives of your neighbours. But, he’s not a hero, right? No, he’s “just another junkie”, an embarrassment to the community–right?

Well, I gotta say…

I think that y’all are the embarrassment. You should be ashamed of your prejudice. This witch hunt initiated and supported by the good citizens of this community is, in my opinion, really nothing short of a hate crime. It’s been reported that this all began due to my hero attending to another person’s wounds and then calling 911. Yep, his righteousness in helping a seriously injured man led to this. The same man so many of you drove past as he struggled to make it to the one place he knew was safe.

Yet, others decided in advance what our fate would be. I encourage every person reading this to look up Pete Fisher’s YouTube video of the July 2023 Police Community Meeting that shows the police representative–actually, lets call a spade a spade–make that the Chief of Police , clearly stating that they had already decided to displace the tenants of 413 Division Street. That place was safety to many. Laundry, showers, a place to rest in safety, to escape the effects of exposure, to cook or eat food, to let down their guard. To smile – free from the malicious glares of ‘normal’ Cobourg residents. You go ahead and pat each others’ backs. Feel really accomplished. Excuse me if I don’t shake your hand!

There are of course, exceptions. I know there are people in Cobourg with caring and concerned hearts. Please understand you aren’t the target of my anger. There are also exceptional people that have made social responsibility their calling–without the incredible support we have received from Missy along with David, Marisa, Bronwyn and the others I’m too emotional to recall names of. I thank you. Without you we would have been completely lost. My gratitude is beyond words.

Sincerely Yours,
Virginia Lee Bailey

Let’s Lead with Love not War

April 2, 2023Northwomen

I am not writing to convince anyone that drug use is OK; that is a moral issue with no place in the argument for the effectiveness of public health initiatives like TweakeasyCBG and the Overdose Prevention Site (OPS) they have established in Cobourg. OPS will benefit people who use drugs and our community. This program will reduce the harm and minimize the impact on our community.

WHAT I WANT YOU TO DO IS TO RETHINK THE WAR ON DRUGS.

Don’t believe me… read the evidence:

STUDY

BC CENTRE ON SUBSTANCE ABUSE

RECOVERY RESEARCH INSTITUTE

I owned a retail store 500 feet from Toronto’s first unsanctioned OPS, this was our experience:

A vast decrease in needles and consumption of tools waste
Zero vandalism on our building
Increase of foot traffic in the area
Community kindness and caring
Zero incidents of harassment threats or crime

As business owners, we met so many incredible humans. People who were pushed to the darkest corners of society for decades were reunited with sunshine and humans that lead with compassion. For many of them, it was one of the first times in years that they didn’t feel alone.

People across this country are dying. Parents, children, and siblings in Cobourg are dying from drug poisoning.

There seems to be a divide in our community on how to help. One group wants to help based on what they think works, and the other takes the lead from those that use drugs.

I am part of the latter.

Imagine you are on the roadside and running out of gas. Someone stops and says, “Hey, I have a can of diesel in the back of my car. I can help you out.” You turn to them and say, “no, thank you, my car takes regular.” They then look at you and say, “I am helping you; don’t be picky,” and then proceed to empty the diesel into your regular tank. They leave believing that not only did they help you by solving your problem, but they also found you ungrateful. However, by choosing not to listen to what help you need, they left you in a worse position than before.

This happens when we don’t listen to the people we are trying to help.

The group behind the OPS in Cobourg, have listened and heard, and are meeting the needs of those whose lives are at risk by providing a space that is not is tucked away in a dark corner of the community. They are giving people a place where they can use knowing that they are not alone. A space where they are treated with compassion and caring. A space where they are not judged by what they do, but appreciated for who they are.

Addiction treatment comes in all shapes and sizes. From the abstinence-only approach to various degrees of harm reduction. The reason is choice. Like most other diseases, the patient is part of their treatment plan. Why should it be any different for drug use?

We can no longer arrest our way out of addiction. The drug war has been going on for decades. It has failed, and it is not working.

Over the last two decades, there has been a movement of end-user lead help, and it has been a game changer for addiction.

For those of us that grew up during the Nancy Regan/Solei Moon-Fry “Say No to Drugs” era, it takes work to break down the systemic belief that drugs are bad, the user is bad, and the only road to redemption is abstinence.

Who can forget that commercial with a frying pan and a cracked egg.

“this is drugs, this is your brain on drugs.”

That was almost 50 years ago. We can no longer arrest our way out of addiction. It has failed, and it is not working. Let’s end the war and treat its victims as they ask, not as we impose.

OPS does not remove access to treatment.

OPS does not take away anyone’s recovery.

OPS is step in the spectrum of recovery.

OPS gives choices to heal.

If your position is one from a moral stand point on addiction, then I implore your moral code and treat people who have used drugs with respect. Take a moment and read the following from Health Canada :

How you can help. A small change can help reduce the cycle of stigma

Stigma around substance use can prevent people from getting the help that they need. You can help by:

Listening with compassion and without judgment, so a person who uses drugs feels heard and understood

Speaking up when someone is being treated disrespectfully because of their substance use; and

Being kind with the words you use. Words Matter. Use people first language.

Instead of “junkie” use “a person who uses drugs”
Instead of “addict” use “people who have used drugs”
Instead of “drug abuse” use “substance use”

One of the first things I learned when I walked into a 12 step meeting was the definition of insanity.

“Doing the same thing over and over again expecting different results”

It’s time to lead with love not war.